The flawed concept of visible and non-visible disabilities
I’ve been a bit under the weather in the past few weeks. I got a new asthma inhaler after my asthma started acting up. Two days after starting the new inhaler, I got a cough, which has kept me exhausted since but seems to be improving now (fingers crossed!).
So the impairment that most impacted my life in the past few weeks was not my spinal cord injury but my asthma. And that’s not so unusual that I say that about my other conditions too, which are often classified as “non-visible”. I think the “concept of visible and non-visible impairments” is totally flawed. I try not to use this classification because it is often inaccurate. It defines disability from a non-disabled perspective. It also ignores that people can have both and that this might change.
A hidden agenda
It also creates a binary that comes with an agenda. Many people who say, “It’s not just about wheelchair users”, often don’t make any efforts at all to serve another group of disabled people. They speak of “hidden disabilities” and don’t notice that many people with energy-limiting conditions — very often non-visible impairments — would also appreciate using a lift to avoid the massive staircase without handrails. Or they use the terms “hidden” and “non-visible” to avoid saying who they actually mean. Autistic people…
